"You Musta Thought It Was White Boy Day!"
The quoted headline, spoken infamously by Gary Oldman in Tony Scott's "True Romance" (pictured left), popped into my head about halfway through Roger Donaldson's "The Bank Job" (pictured right). "Bank" is out of control. And apparently it is white boy day.
The kind of "based on a true story" plot that attaches itself to a movie like Donaldson's is the kind that is entertaining to watch unfold, but in retrospect doesn't really make any logical sense--well it does, but it's more of a logic that certain people who die, die and certain people who need to get arrested, get arrested. That sort of thing. There's no real emotional attachment between audience and onscreen players. When a woman is beheaded in front of an already dug grave, it's more for shock value; there's no pathos. And what's worse is that it really happened to someone.
This shouldn't stop you from watching "Bank" though. It delivers on its ads: sex, crime, cheeky bastards. But its an exercise in predetermined chaos; a frenzy of activity that is on train rails headed toward the inevitable conclusion, to be followed by a loud credit sequence.
And so what began as an initial movie review has derailed into a look back at a more successful film in onscreen chaos: "True Romance." I can't think of any other movie that features a triple-Sonny-Chiba-feature reference, the late Chris Penn as a good guy and Samuel L. Jackson making 'eating pussy' wisecracks, which all culminates into a final product that not only compelled me to purchase it years ago, but continues to draw me back for an occasional viewing.
Somehow, in the deeply perverse Tarantino screenplay, there was a certain eloquence to the dialogue and the way the two lead lovebirds (Christian Slater and Patricia Arquette) convinced us to see them as more than a violent Bonnie and Clyde duo; to rather see them as a 90s pop-infused pairing of drifting souls aspiring toward a lost era (Slater's devotion to Elvis, for example).
The carnage that is climaxed to at the end of "True Romance" held a sort of biblical uprising in its passages. By the end of "The Bank Job" however, though I was happy to see our lead guys catch lucky breaks, I couldn't help but see frontman Jason Statham tease the audience with promised fight moves for an inevitable "Transporter 3" movie. I didn't see the exciting climax to an otherwise exhausting plot.
Yet in a current world without a fresh Guy Ritchie flick in theatres, "Bank" proves to be a welcomed but mild return for Statham. At least he's not in a fucking Jet Li movie.
Comments
wow, this film sets the bar pretty low for movies in 2008.....oh wait, just watched Drill Bit Taylor, im being told the bar just got lower. all kidding aside though, i thought the bank job was a very respectable heist caper that kept the suspense high and the surprises coming. although i wasn't exactly glued to the screen, the plots unpredictable (sometimes confusing) twists, along with director Roger Donaldson's choice not to beat the audience over the head with unnecessary action sequences, kept it interesting. the fact that it's based on true events only adds to the films appeal (i found myself googling the incident as soon as i got home). as for the acting, i found the slew of excellent british character actors far more appealing than the films actual stars. i'm not saying Jason Statham is horrible, he's just... well....Jason Statham, the guy owes more to his facial stubble than his actual acting. it's no True Romance, but the Bank Job holds its own. and godammit, i can't wait till Transporter 3.......wait, they made a Transporter 2?
Posted by: gildog | March 10, 2008 12:27 AM
Ugh! That's the worst Gary Oldman performance in history! Sorry, I'm only referring to the pic.
Posted by: Rorsky | June 14, 2008 12:37 AM